Integrasi Agama Dan Sains dalam Sistem Pendidikan Model Kuttab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2023.13.1.85-104Keywords:
Integration of Religion and Science, Kuttab, Education SystemAbstract
With the rise of curriculum-based religious education which is guided by memorization and mastery of reading and studying the Koran in elementary age children, education today is only oriented towards diplomas and tactical mechanical abilities. Education during the time of the Prophet apart from teaching the ability to write and study the Koran also taught Adab and Faith, something that is rarely found in education today. However, along with developments in the era of the Prophet's era, education which was realized in the Kuttab education system was not enough to answer the challenges of the times, therefore Kuttab education must also be adaptive by integrating religious education in Kuttab with general knowledge content, or in other words, integrating religion and science. This research aims to describe the Kuttab model Islamic Education System, understand the integration between science and religion, and determine the qualifications of Al Fatih Malang kuttab model Islamic education graduates. This research uses a qualitative case study type approach. The results of this research show an integrative learning model in religious education. The Iman morafaqot curriculum in discussing science can be combined thematically with Al-Qur'an learning
(Tadabbur), and mufarroqot in Al-Qur'an learning which is integrated with scientific observations. Kuttab Al Fatih Malang applies the relationship between science and religion with the principles of faith and the Koran. Implementation of the relationship between science and religion takes the form of habituation, namely the habituation of the muroja'ah of the
Qur'an, and the implementation of 3S (Greetings, Smiles, Greetings)
Downloads
References
Afnil, Guza. “UU SISDIKNAS No. 20 Th 2003 dan UU Dosen No. 14 Th 2005.” Jakarta, Asa mandiri (2008).
Amin, Abdullah. “Progressivity of Classical Islam and The Project of Ihy?? al- Tur?th.” Debating Progressive Islam (2009).
Arifudin, Iis. “Integrasi Sains dan Agama serta Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Islam.” Edukasia Islamika (2016): 161–180.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. “Arikunto, Suharsimi.(1993). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.” (2010).
Bungin, Burhan. “Metodologi Penelitian Sosial & ekonomi: Format-format kuantitatif dan Kualitatif untuk studi sosiologi, kebijakan publik, komunikasi, manajemen, dan pemasaran” (2013).
Creswell, John W. “Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset.” Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar (2015).
Daradjat, Zakiah, A Sadali, Yusuf Amer Feisal, Ishaq Abdulhaq, Mustofa Muchsin, dan Miftah Faridl. “Dasar-dasar agama islam” (2019).
Fahruddin, M. Mukhlis. “Kuttab: Madrasah Pada Masa Awal (Umayyah) Pendidikan Islam.” Jurnal Madrasah 2, no. 2 (2010).
Fathurrahman. “Eksistensi Kuttab dan Masjid Sebagai Institusi Pendidikan Pada Masa Pertumbuhan Islam.” Jurnal Studi Pemikiran Pendidikan Agama Islam 14, no. 1 (2017).
Feisal, Jusuf A. Reorientasi Pendidikan Islam. Gema Insani, 1995.
Hasan, Langgulung. “Asas-Asas Pendidikan Islam.” Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Husna Baru (2003).
Hujair A.H., Sanaky. “Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia, Suatu Kajian Upaya Pemberdayaan.” Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Pendidikan 13, no. 1 (2008).
Junaedi, H Mahfud, dan Mirza Mahbub Wijaya. Pengembangan Paradigma Keilmuan Perspektif Epistemologi Islam: Dari Perenialisme hingga Islamisme, IntegrasiInterkoneksi dan Unity of Sciences. Prenada Media, 2020.
KHUN, THOMAS S. “La estructura de las revoluciones científicas.” Investigación económica 28, no. 111/112 (1968): 189–196.
Kurniawan, Rofiq, dan Yudi Ardian Rahman. “Revolusi Ilmiah Membedah Paradigma Sains Perspektif Thomas Khun.” Tsaqofah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 5, no. 1 (2021).
Mahmud, Amir, dan Zaini Tamin Ar. “Transformasi Pesantren (Studi terhadap Dialektika Kurikulum dan Kelembagaan Pondok Pesantren Rifaiyah Pati).” EL-BANAT: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam 9, no. 2 (2019): 156–176.
Mahzar, Armahedi. Integralisme; Sebuah Rekonstruksi Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Pustaka, 1983.
Masduki. “Menuju Sistem Pendidikan Integrasi Melalui Dekonstruksi Dikotomi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman 5, no. 1 (2006).
Moh Abdul Kholiq, Hasan. “Metode Salafush Shalih dalam Berinteraksi Dengan alQur`an.” Al-A’raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat 12, no. 2 (2015).
Moleong, Lexy J. “Metode penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi.” Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya (2014).
Multahada, Asyruni. “Integrasi Agama dan Sains.” Borneo: Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 1 (2021): 46–55.
Nana, Sudjana. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Al Gesindo, 2005.
Purwanto, Ngalim. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda karya, 2006.
Sevriana, Lufthia, Erie Febrian, Mokhamad Anwar, dan Yudi Ahmad Faisal. “A proposition to implement inclusive Islamic financial planning in Indonesia through
bibliometric analysis.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research (2022).
Shapin, Steven. The scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Sun Haji. “Pembelajaran tematik yang ideal di SD/MI.” Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI 3, no. 1 (2015).
Suprayogo, Imam. “Paradigma Pengembangan Keilmuan Islam Perspektif UIN Malang.” UIN-Maliki Press, 2006.
Tadjab, Muhaimin, dan Abd Mujib. “Dimensi-Dimensi Studi Islam.” Surabaya: Karya Abitama (1994).
Yaman, Basyir, dan Fades Br Gultom. “Islamic Education System: Implementation of Curriculum Kuttab Al-Fatih Semarang.” International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences 11, no. 12 (2017).
Zainal, Arifin. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: prinsip teknik produk. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda karya, 2011.
Ziaudin, Sardar. Masa Depan Islam. Bandung: Pustaka, 1987.
Zulhimma. “Sejarah Pendidikan Islam pada Masa Kegemilangan Islam.” Nur El-Islam 1, no. 2 (2014).
