Problematika Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2017.7.1.43-65Keywords:
gerakan pembaharuan, relativisme, kontekstualisasiAbstract
Discussions about Islamic thought in Indonesia have always been an ongoing an endless series of continuous processes. The reason is simple, namely to maintain and preserve the universalism of Islam from possible distortions. In its development In its development, this series has experienced a tug-of-war in meaning, some of which remain firm on the unity between Islam and Islamic thought, while others remain firm on the unity between Islam and Islamic thought. on the unity between Islam and Islamic thought, but there are also those who want to divide it into two entities. There are also those who want to divide it into two different entities. This article is here to provide a firm answer to this problem, while trying to present some this issue, while trying to explain some of the possible consequences of this disagreement. From readings, tajd?d has experienced a tug-of-war in understanding. There are those who define it as a process of extracting true values through true understanding, based on the text, without values through a correct understanding, based on the text, without
cultivating the context of changing times as the prima causa. At On the other hand, the challengers of the idea tried to place the the ideas of renewal that revolve around; the importance of the importance of the contextualization of ijtih?d; rationality in renewal; pro-social and religious pluralism; and the elimination of religion from sociopolitics. social and religious pluralism; and the elimination of religion from sociopolitics. The logical consequence of the latter idea is that the view that Islam needs to be reformed, in order to be more friendly to concepts of religious pluralism, relativism, and deconstruction of the concepts of religious pluralism, relativism, and deconstruction of the method of law-making, and even should dare to state that the products of previous scholarly thought are no longer valid, and need to be reformed. are no longer valid, and need to be reformulated to fit the current context.
the current context.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Muhammad Amin. Studi Agama Normativitas atau Historitas?. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Attas (al), Syed Muhammad Naquib, Islam dan Sekularisme. Bandung: Institut Pemikiran dan Pembangunan Islam (PIMPIN), 2010.
Barton, Greg. Gagasan Islam Liberal. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1999.
Bus??l, As?ad Namir. Sheikh Muhammad Rash?d Rid??'s Political Activities: A Struggle for the Revival of an Orthodox (Salaf?) Islamic State. Berkeley: University of California, 1974.
Efendi, Djohan et. al. (ed.). Pergolakan Pemikiran Islam: Catatan Harian Ahmad Wahib. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2003.
Ghaz?l?y (al), Ab? H?mid. Tah?fut al-Fal?sifah, ed. Sulayman Duny?. Kairo: D?r al-Ma’?rif, t.th.
Grose, George B. et al. Tiga Agama Satu Tuhan. Bandung: Mizan, 1999.
Jabiri (al), Muhammad Abid. Nahnu wa al-Turath. Beyrut: Markaz Dir?sat Wahdah ‘Arabiyyah, 1980.
Jahanbakhs, Farough. Islam, Democracy, and Religious Modernism in Iran (1953-2000); From B?zarg?n to Soroush. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2001.
Jawhary (al), Isma’il Ibn Hamm?d. Mu’jam al-S?ihah. Beyrut: D?r alMa’rifah, 2008.
Jawziyyah (al), Ibn Qayyim. ‘Awn al-Ma’bud Sharh Sunan Abi Dawud, vol. 11. Mad?nah: Maktabah al-Salafiyah, 1969.
Kilani (al), Majid ‘Irsan. Misteri Masa Kelam Islam dan Kemenangan Perang Salib, terj. Asep Sobari et. al. Bekasi: Kalam Aulia Mediatama, 2007.
Legenhauseng, M. Pluralitas dan Pluralisme Agama. T.t.: Shadra Press, 2010.
Madjid, Nurcholis. Keharusan Pembaruan Pemikiran Islam dan Masalah Integrasi Umat. T.t.: t.p., 1970.
______ “Pijakan Keimanan bagi Fiqih Lintas Agama” dalam Fiqih Lintas Agama: Membangun Masyarakat Inklusif –Pluralis, ed. Mun’im A. Sirry. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2004.
______ Islam, Kemodernan dan Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Mizan, 1987.
Manz??r, Ibn. Lis?n al-‘Arab, vol. 3. T.t.: D?r S??dir, 2003.
Mawd?d?y (al), Ab? al-A’l?. T?rikh M?jaz Tajd?d al-D?n wa Ih?y?`ihi. Damaskus: D?r al-Fikr, 1964.
Muammar, M. Arfan. Majukah Islam dengan Menjadi Sekuler (Kasus Turki). Ponorogo: Centre for Islamic and Occidental Studies, 2007.
Mustofa, Imron. “Kritik Metode Kontekstualisasi Penafsiran al-Qur’?n Abdullah Saeed”, ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi KeIslaman, vol. 10, no. 2. Maret 2016.
Nasution, Harun. Islam Rasional, Gagasan dan Pemikiran. Bandung: Mizan, 1996.
______ Pembaharuan dalam Islam: Sejarah Pemikiran dan Gerakan. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.
Rahardjo, Dawam. Pengantar Dekonstruksi Islam Madzhab Ciputat, ed. Edy A. Effendy. Bandung: Zaman Wacana Mulia, 1999.
Rasjidi, H. M. Koreksi Terhadap Dr. Harun Nasution, tentang Islam Ditinjau dari Berbagai Aspeknya. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1977.
Said, Busthami M. Pembaharu dan Pembaharuan dalam Islam, terj. Mahsun al-Mundzir. Pusat Studi Ilmu dan Amal, 1992.
Sh?kir (al), Ibn. Taby?n Kidzbi al-Muftar? f? m? Nusiba il? al-Im?m Ab? alH?asan al-‘Ash’?r?y. Kairo: Maktabah al-Azhariyah li al-Turath, 1999.
Sijistany (al), Ab? Daw?d Sulayman b. al-Asy’ats. Sunan Ab? Daw?d. Beyrut: D?r Ibn H?azm, 1998.
Soroush, Abdolkarim. “The Evolution and Devolution of Religious Knowledge”, dalam Liberal Islam: A Source Book, ed. Charles Kurzman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Syaf’ie, Imam. Retorika dalam Menulis. Jakarta: Dependikbud, 1988
