Tarik Ulur Tatanan Sosial antara Marx dan Al-Faruqi

Authors

  • Siti Aminah Stai YPBWI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2017.7.1.1-20

Keywords:

perubahan sosial, marxisme, stratifikasi, tatanan sosial

Abstract

This article is here to elaborate on the thoughts of Marx and al-Faruqi, especially about the unity of social, economic and cultural concepts that give birth to the social system of society. From this article, it is found that that Marx is someone who is considered to have a major role in social development. in social development. The views he put forward seemed to unite the world of economics, government, and technology. Marx's theory of social change formulates socio-cultural change as a as a result of production, and as a result, the formation of the
classification of society. This change will lead to a revolution in the social order of society. He also saw that the suffering of society is caused by the birth of social classifications among them. among them. Religion for him was nothing more than a form of escapism that promises false happiness to the lower classes. the lower classes. On the other hand, al-Faruqi has a different view from Marx in addressing the conditions of society. different from Marx in addressing the condition of society. society. Uniquely he uses a tawh?d?y perspective, namely a perspective based on tawhid, as the basis of all human activities and thinking. the basis of all human activities and mindsets. The second figure sees the social as an attachment that encompasses all of humanity without exception, with the following includes all humanity without exception, with the principle of educating each other, in order to instill the values of responsibility. principle of educating each other, in order to instill the values of responsibility and morality. morals. As for the foundation of the ummah, it is tawhid, moreover for him
tawhid is a form of divine belief, which demands the fulfillment of the fulfillment of commands with the ethical element of God's will.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahmansyah. Wacana Pendidikan Islam Khazanah Filosofis dan Implementasi Kuriulum, Metodologi dan Tantangan Pendidikan Moralitas. Yogyakarta: Global Pustaka, Utama, 2004.
Adian, Donny Gahral. Percik Pemikiran Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2006.
Banna (al), Hasan. Majm?’ah ar-Ras?il. Beyrut: al-Mu`assasah alIsl?miyyah, 1984.
Campbell, Tom. Tujuh Teori Sosial, Sketsa,Penilaian, Perbandingan, terj. F.
Budi Hardiman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1994.
Ebenstein, William. Today’s Isms. Tokyo: Prentice Hall of Japan, 1965.
Faruqi (al), Ismail Raji. Al-Tawhid It’s Implications for Thought and Life. Virginia: IIIT, 1992.
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. London: Polity Press, 1984.
Hadiwijono, Harun. Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2. Yogjakarta: Kanisius, 1980.
Hamsem, O. Marxisme dan Agama. Bandung: Balai Pustaka, 1984.
Hashim, Rosnani. “Gagasan Islamisasi Kontemporer: Sejarah Perkembangan dan Arah Tujuan”, Islamia: Majalah Pemikiran dan Peradaban
Islam. Jakarta: Insist, 2005.
Jhonson, Doyle Paul. Teori sosiologi Klasik dan Modern, terj. Robert M. Z. Lawang. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1986.
Kuntowijoyo. Islam sebagai Ilmu. Jakarta: Teraju, 2005
______. Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi Untuk Aksi. Bandung: Mizan, 1991.
Mahmud, Moh. Natsir. “Landasan Paradigmatik Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan”, dalam Sinergi Agama dan Sains, ed. Nurman Said, et.
al. Makassar: Alauddin Press, 2005.
Marx, Karl et. al. The Communist Manifesto. T.t.: The Floating Press, 2009.
______. Introduction to Critigur of Hegel's philosophy of Right. T.t.: t.p., 1884.
Mustofa, Imron. "Kritik Metode Kontekstualisasi Penafsiran al-Qur’?n Abdullah Saeed", ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, vol. 10, no. 2 (Maret 2016)
______. “Turki antara Sekularisme dan Aroma Islam; Studi atas Pemikiran Niyazi Berkes”, Jurnal EL-BANAT: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, (Juni 2016)
Novia, Windy. Kamus Ilmiah Populer. T.t.: Wipress, 2009.
Ramly, Andi M. Peta Pemikiran Karl Marx. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara, 2004.
Rius. Marx untuk pemula. Yogyakarta: Insist, 2000.
Roqib, Moh. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Yogyakarta: LKIS Pelangi Angkasa, 2009
Russel, Bertand. Sejarah Filsafat Barat dan Kaitannya dengan Kondisi Sosio-Politik dari zaman Kini Hingga Sekarang, terj. Sigit Jetmikoet. al. Yogyakarta: t.p., 2003.
Saefuddin, Didin. Pemikiran Modern dan Postmodern Islam. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2003.
Safuddin, Dian. Pemikiran Modern dan Post Modern Islam Biografi Inteleqtual 17 Tokoh. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2003.
Said, Usman et. al. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam, Konsep dan Perkembangan Pemikirannya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada 1994.
Sani, Abdul. Lintasan Sejarah Pemikiran Perkembangan Modern dalam Islam. Bandung: Raja Gravindo Persada, 1998.
Sasono, Adi. Solusi Islam atas Problematika Umat: Ekonomi, Pendidikan, dan Dakwah. T.t.: Gema Insani, 1998.
Suseno, Franz Magnis. Pemikiran Karl Marx. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1999.
Syukur, M. Amin. Teologi Islam Terapan: Upaya Antisipatif terhadap Hedonisme Kehidupan Modern. T.t.: Tiga Serangkai, 2003.
Tafsir, Ahmad. Filsafat Ilmu: Mengurai Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Pengetahuan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004.
Van Peursen, C. A. Strategi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1976.
Vos, De. Antropologi Filsafat. Yogyakarta: t.p., 1968.
Wan Daud, Wan Mohd Nor. Filsafat dan Praktik Pendidikan Islam Syed
Muhammad. Naquib al-Attas, terj. Hamid Fahmy et. al. Bandung: Mizan, 1998

Downloads

Published

2017-06-19

How to Cite

Aminah, S. (2017). Tarik Ulur Tatanan Sosial antara Marx dan Al-Faruqi. EL-BANAT: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2017.7.1.1-20

Issue

Section

Articles